“Interview Scheduled for $5 million”
Thursday, January 31st, 2008Imagine that headline! Or if you saw this in your inbox: “We’re looking forward to meeting you. Please bring a certified check for $200 for the time the interviewer will spend with you.”
I don’t think very many people would be happy with either scenario.
This article on Inc.com talks about a website called Notchup.com that is setting up a system for passive job seekers (those not actively applying to jobs posted on job boards or telling everyone they know they’re looking) to be paid when asked to interview with hiring companies.
The argument is that companies looking for the A players in their market are struggling to even get people to listen to their offers. So throw them a couple hundred bucks to listen to your pitch and maybe they’ll be that much closer to joining your team and bringing more success to your organization.
The nay-sayers claim that passive seekers will become serial interviewers and only go on appointments to gain pocket-cash. They’ll be “psychologically” turned OFF from considering the position because they’re only there for the money.
I am not so sure anyone would be willing to make up excuses to leave the office during the business day to go and listen to an interview, AND get paid for it, if they’re NOT still willing to listen attentively to what’s being proposed.
I also think that, when I work with and meet people everyday who would pay employers to interview them for informational meetings, just to get some knowledge and start a new professional relationship, maybe there are other things that need to change before companies start forking over money to interview candidates.
The article mentions that guest columnist for Inc.com Joel Spolsky recommends companies find good interns, and treat them so well they don’t want to leave. You’re then able to train them in YOUR methodology and values, and they grow with the company, instead of throwing away millions in a high-turn-over world when you hire someone who’s simply out of the highest bid. Why is this concept so hard to conceive?
It seems a bit like Notchup was getting some cheap PR from Inc.com. I bet you’re going to go look at the site, right? Isn’t that what they’re hoping? Isn’t it half the battle to just get a top-level candidate in the door to consider the options?
Technorati Tags: paid to interview, hire young, passive candidates, try something new, cheap public relations

